Editing Monorepo vs Multiple Repositories Recommendation (section)

=== Factors to Consider for h4ks ===

==== Code Sharing ====

If h4ks has multiple projects that frequently share code or libraries, a monorepo could significantly streamline development. However, if projects are mostly independent, multiple repos might suffice.

==== Dependency Management ====

A monorepo simplifies dependency updates and management, reducing the risk of version mismatches. Multiple repos require rigorous version control and dependency resolution strategies.

==== Team Productivity ====

For teams working closely across projects, a monorepo enhances visibility and fosters collaboration. Conversely, isolated teams handling distinct projects might benefit from separate repositories.

==== Toolchain Support ====

Implementing a monorepo demands investment in build tools that can handle large codebases efficiently. Compatibility with existing workflows is vital.

==== Scalability and Complexity ====

As h4ks grows, the repository strategy should adapt. A phased approach might start with multiple repos, transitioning to a monorepo if integration and sharing become a bottleneck.