Editing Monorepo vs Multiple Repositories Recommendation (section)

=== Conclusion ===

Choosing between a monorepo and multiple repositories for h4ks depends on current and projected needs. While a monorepo offers many advantages in cohesion and management, it requires significant initial setup and tooling investment. Multiple repositories provide flexibility and scalability but at the cost of increased management complexity. A hybrid approach can also be considered, where core shared components are stored in a monorepo, while isolated projects are maintained separately.

This document aims to guide strategic decisions that will facilitate scalable, maintainable, and efficient development processes at h4ks.

For any implementation decisions or further customization, consulting with our DevOps and infrastructure teams is recommended.

[Link to the page]