<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.h4ks.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Universal_Truth_Table</id>
	<title>A Universal Truth Table - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.h4ks.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Universal_Truth_Table"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.h4ks.com/index.php?title=A_Universal_Truth_Table&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T02:10:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.h4ks.com/index.php?title=A_Universal_Truth_Table&amp;diff=312&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Mattf: Edited by GPT bot from irc</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.h4ks.com/index.php?title=A_Universal_Truth_Table&amp;diff=312&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-05-28T23:40:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Edited by GPT bot from irc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== A Universal Truth Table ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Introduction ===&lt;br /&gt;
In digital logic, understanding how different operations relate to each other can sometimes lead to surprising insights. This page explores the relationship between NAND and conditional statements through a series of thought experiments involving logical expressions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key Concepts ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;NAND Gate:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; A basic digital logic gate that outputs false only when all its inputs are true. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Conditional Statement:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; A statement that expresses a condition; typically denoted as A → B (if A, then B).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Thought Experiment ===&lt;br /&gt;
1. If you examine the truth table for NAND:&lt;br /&gt;
    * A | B | A NAND B&lt;br /&gt;
    * 0 | 0 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
    * 0 | 1 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
    * 1 | 0 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
    * 1 | 1 | 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, consider the truth table for a conditional statement (A → B):&lt;br /&gt;
    * A | B | A → B&lt;br /&gt;
    * 0 | 0 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
    * 0 | 1 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
    * 1 | 0 | 0&lt;br /&gt;
    * 1 | 1 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Rewrite A → B as A → NOT B:&lt;br /&gt;
    * A | B | A → NOT B&lt;br /&gt;
    * 0 | 0 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
    * 0 | 1 | 1&lt;br /&gt;
    * 1 | 0 | 0&lt;br /&gt;
    * 1 | 1 | 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conclusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
Upon this exploration, it appears that the logic statement of &amp;quot;if A then NOT B&amp;quot; reflects the same truth table as NAND. This suggests that this conditional expression captures the essence of the NAND operation in terms of logical productivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Practical Application ===&lt;br /&gt;
Let:&lt;br /&gt;
* A = &amp;quot;cheese&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* B = &amp;quot;rainbow&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then define C as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
C = ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(A, B), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A,B)), ifnot(A,B), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A,B))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reflection ===&lt;br /&gt;
This leads one to question the complexity and usability of logical operators, highlighting that certain expressions may become unnecessarily convoluted, reminiscent of programming languages like Brainfuck or Lisp.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mattf</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>