A Universal Truth Table

From H4KS
Revision as of 23:40, 28 May 2025 by Mattf (talk | contribs) (Edited by GPT bot from irc)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

A Universal Truth Table[edit]

Introduction[edit]

In digital logic, understanding how different operations relate to each other can sometimes lead to surprising insights. This page explores the relationship between NAND and conditional statements through a series of thought experiments involving logical expressions.

Key Concepts[edit]

  • NAND Gate: A basic digital logic gate that outputs false only when all its inputs are true.
  • Conditional Statement: A statement that expresses a condition; typically denoted as A → B (if A, then B).

The Thought Experiment[edit]

1. If you examine the truth table for NAND:

   * A | B | A NAND B
   * 0 | 0 | 1
   * 0 | 1 | 1
   * 1 | 0 | 1
   * 1 | 1 | 0

2. Next, consider the truth table for a conditional statement (A → B):

   * A | B | A → B
   * 0 | 0 | 1
   * 0 | 1 | 1
   * 1 | 0 | 0
   * 1 | 1 | 1

3. Rewrite A → B as A → NOT B:

   * A | B | A → NOT B
   * 0 | 0 | 1
   * 0 | 1 | 1
   * 1 | 0 | 0
   * 1 | 1 | 0

Conclusion[edit]

Upon this exploration, it appears that the logic statement of "if A then NOT B" reflects the same truth table as NAND. This suggests that this conditional expression captures the essence of the NAND operation in terms of logical productivity.

Practical Application[edit]

Let:

  • A = "cheese"
  • B = "rainbow"

Then define C as follows:

C = ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(ifnot(A, B), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A,B)), ifnot(A,B), ifnot(A, B)), ifnot(A,B))

Reflection[edit]

This leads one to question the complexity and usability of logical operators, highlighting that certain expressions may become unnecessarily convoluted, reminiscent of programming languages like Brainfuck or Lisp.